Side by side
| D Semax | D Selank | |
|---|---|---|
| LYO grade (best outcome) | D | D |
| Built from | ACTH(4-7) + Pro-Gly-Pro | Tuftsin (Thr-Lys-Pro-Arg) + Pro-Gly-Pro |
| Length | 7 amino acids | 7 amino acids |
| Registered in Russia for | Ischaemic stroke; cognitive indications | Anxiety disorders |
| Form | Nasal drops | Nasal drops |
| Human trials to international standard | None identified | None identified |
| Independent replication | None found | None found |
| Approved in EU / US / UK | No | No |
| WADA | Not on the list | Not on the list |
There is no evidence-based winner. If the question is which is for what, Semax is the cognition-and-stroke peptide and Selank the anxiety peptide, by Russian registration. If the question is which one works, neither has a trial that meets international standards, and the honest answer is the same for both: unproven.
Same tail, different head
Both peptides end in the same three amino acids, Pro-Gly-Pro, added to slow the enzymes that would otherwise break a short peptide down in minutes. What sits in front of that tail is the difference. Semax carries residues 4 to 7 of ACTH — the fragment that keeps the hormone's effects on the nervous system without its effect on the adrenal glands. Selank carries tuftsin, a four-amino-acid immune-signalling peptide. Both were developed at the Institute of Molecular Genetics in Moscow, which is also where most of the literature on them comes from.
What the Russian registrations rest on
Semax has been a registered medicine in Russia since the 1990s, for acute ischaemic stroke and for cognitive indications; Selank was registered later as an anxiolytic. The trials behind those registrations exist, and some of the Selank studies compared it against benzodiazepines. The problem is not that the work was never done; it is that it was done to a standard that cannot be checked from outside — often open-label, often without a proper comparison group, published largely in Russian outside the indexed international literature, and never replicated by a group that did not develop the compound.
Why both are grade D despite being approved somewhere
LYO grades the evidence, not the paperwork. A registration is a regulatory fact and is recorded on each compound's page under Russia; the grade reflects whether controlled human trials meeting international standards support the claim. The contrast with GHRP-2 is instructive: it is approved in Japan as a diagnostic, and its diagnostic outcome is graded A — because the data behind that approval are checkable. Semax and Selank's are not, so the grade stays where the checkable evidence is.
Safety and legality
Both are reported as well tolerated in Russian use, and both have been used clinically there for years, which is reassuring without being the same thing as pharmacovigilance data. Neither is approved in the EU, the US or the UK; in the EU and UK, supplying either for human use is an offence for the seller. Neither is on the WADA Prohibited List.
Questions people actually ask
Why is Semax grade D if Russia approved it?
Is Selank an alternative to benzodiazepines?
Are Semax and Selank legal in the EU, US or UK?
References
- 1Searches of PubMed and trial registries for Semax human trials outside Russia.LYO literature search, September 2026No randomised trials meeting international reporting standards identified.
- 2Searches of PubMed and trial registries for Selank human trials outside Russia.LYO literature search, September 2026No independently replicated randomised trials identified.
- 3State Register of Medicinal Products of the Russian Federation (ГРЛС).Russian Ministry of HealthSource for the Russian registrations.