What the studies show
The EMA's 2012 review of randomised trials found a higher proportion of cancers in people on calcitonin than on placebo (about 2.4% excess for the nasal spray over long-term use). The signal is small and the mechanism unknown, but it was enough to end chronic use.
Human trials exist and mostly agree, but there are too few of them, they are too small, or one big one is still reading out. Expect the grade to move.
- 1European Medicines Agency. European Medicines Agency recommends limiting long-term use of calcitonin medicines (press release, 20 July 2012).EMAWithdrawal of the nasal spray; cancer signal from pooled trials.
In context
Calcitonin is a thyroid hormone that lowers blood calcium by slowing bone breakdown; the salmon version, more potent than human, was sold for decades as an osteoporosis nasal spray. Its one large fracture trial found a 33% reduction in spinal fractures at the middle dose and none at the higher one. In 2012–2013 European and other regulators withdrew the nasal spray after meta-analyses found a small excess of cancers, leaving short-term injectable use for Paget's disease and hypercalcaemia.
Calcitonin (salmon) is approved (rx, restricted). Legal status differs by country — see the regulation section or the jurisdiction pages.
Questions
Is Calcitonin (salmon) proven to cause cancer risk?
What studies are behind the grade?
Is Calcitonin (salmon) approved for this?
Other outcomes for Calcitonin (salmon)
- AVertebral fracture risk (osteoporosis, nasal spray)1 large RCT (n=1,255, 5 yr)
- ADose–responseSame RCT
- APaget's disease and acute hypercalcaemiaDecades of use; older trials
Written and maintained by LYO Research — how pages are written and checked. Reviewed 23 September 2026. Grades count human evidence only; see how LYO grades. Not medical advice. Correct this page →