What the studies show
Non-vertebral fractures 2.7% against 4.7% on placebo — a relative reduction of about 43% in the published analysis. Hip fractures were too few to judge.
Several well-run randomised trials in people, pointing the same way. You can plan around this. It still says nothing about whether the effect is worth the side effects for you.
- 1Miller PD, Hattersley G, Riis BJ, et al. Effect of abaloparatide vs placebo on new vertebral fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: a randomized clinical trial (ACTIVE).JAMA, 2016;316:722–7332,463 women, 18 months; abaloparatide 80 µg vs placebo vs open-label teriparatide. Fracture percentages are in the paper's table, not the abstract.
In context
Abaloparatide is a 34-amino-acid analogue of parathyroid-hormone-related protein, given as a daily injection for osteoporosis at high fracture risk. In the ACTIVE trial, 2,463 postmenopausal women were randomised to abaloparatide, placebo or open-label teriparatide for 18 months; abaloparatide reduced new vertebral and non-vertebral fractures against placebo and caused less hypercalcaemia than teriparatide. Approved in the US since 2017 and the EU since 2022.
Abaloparatide is approved (rx). Legal status differs by country — see the regulation section or the jurisdiction pages.
Questions
Is Abaloparatide proven to help with non-vertebral fracture risk?
What studies are behind the grade?
Is Abaloparatide approved for this?
Other outcomes for Abaloparatide
- AVertebral fracture risk (postmenopausal osteoporosis)1 large RCT (n=2,463, 18 mo)
- AHypercalcaemia (vs teriparatide)adverseSame RCT, prespecified safety endpoint
- ABone mineral densitySame RCT
Written and maintained by LYO Research — how pages are written and checked. Reviewed 23 September 2026. Grades count human evidence only; see how LYO grades. Not medical advice. Correct this page →